|
|
CONSERVATION
Forming a Bachelor Group
At the Louisville Zoo's Gorilla Forest
Compiled by Roby
Elsner
Tremendous
advancements in the care and management of captive western lowland
gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) have been made over the past
twenty-five years. Many of today’s zoos strive to house their gorillas
in complex, spacious, and natural exhibits, as well as provide them with
adequate mental stimulation, nutrition, and veterinary care. Another
important aspect of modern gorilla programs is the provision of
appropriate social stimulation. A better understanding of the social
structure of wild gorillas has encouraged zoos to maintain gorillas in
species typical groups.
As a polygynous species, wild gorillas
most typically live in long-term, established social units comprised of
a leading silverback, several adult females, and their immature
offspring. Groups vary in size from two to twenty individuals. Before
breeding, females transfer to other social groups or reside with
solitary silverbacks. Maturing male gorillas, or blackbacks (yet to
develop the characteristic silverback graying), leave their natal groups
as well, living solitarily or occasionally in all-male groups – known as
bachelor groups -- until being able to create cohesive family units of
their own (Parnell 2002).
Maintaining gorillas in social groups
similar to that of their wild counterparts and employing other methods
to improve the captive environment have led to improvements in
reproductive success. In the 1970’s, captive gorilla births were
uncommon and a majority of the infants born were pulled for
hand-rearing. Not only has breeding success increased since then, but
more females now demonstrate maternal competence. Many of them were
raised in or introduced to social groups themselves, and it is hoped
that they will raise their offspring successfully within their own
groups. For females that need some assistance raising their offspring,
zoos have developed training programs to foster maternal care. Sometimes
because of health or social constraints, hand-raising is unavoidable. In
these instances, some zoos have implemented surrogacy programs, where
adoptive gorillas provide care-giving behaviors to the infants and help
them integrate successfully into social groups at a young age.
Hand-raised females integrated into social groups at a young age have a
likely better chance of demonstrating species-typical breeding behavior
and exhibiting adequate maternal skills toward any potential offspring
(Beck and Power 1988; Ryan et al. 2002).
Captive gorilla population management
has become increasingly important with the growing number of births,
especially considering that the birth ratio for this polygynous species
is non-sex biased. Approximately 50 percent of gorillas born in
captivity are females and 50 percent males. With the same number of male
and females born in captivity, maintaining gorillas in species-typical
groups means that some males will inevitably be without female social
partners.
As
young male gorillas of the wild mature within their natal group, they
represent potential competition for the leading silverbacks, who become
less tolerant of the blackbacks. At this point the young males would
likely leave their natal groups to live a portion of their lives outside
mixed-sex social groups. Captive blackbacks within family units often
become less tolerated by the silverbacks as well, resulting in possible
aggression. Borrowing the example from the wild several years ago, the
American Association of Zoos & Aquariums’ Gorilla Species Survival Plan
Management Group suggested the formation of all-male groups, or bachelor
groups, within zoos to address the needs of the captive gorilla
population (Hutchins et al. 2001) Through various methods with males of
varying ages and numbers, several zoos have successfully formed bachelor
groups of males and continue to maintain them as such. In forming these
groups, zoos tried combining males of adult ages, one or more males of
an adult age with one or more juvenile males, or all juvenile males.
While the former strategy failed, the latter two have worked. St Louis
Zoo formed a bachelor troop in 1990, Cleveland created one in 1994, and
Zoo Atlanta followed in 1996. Other zoos with bachelor groups include
Disney’s Animal Kingdom, Santa Barbara Zoo, Knoxville Zoo, Kansas City
Zoo, St Paul’s Como Zoo, and Birmingham Zoo. Several zoos with gorilla
exhibits in the construction phase, such as Sedgwick County Zoo and
Henry Doorly Zoo, plan to house bachelor groups.
There is still much to be learned on
the requirements necessary to successfully form and maintain potentially
long-term, stable groups of all-male gorillas. Just as much was learned
from field and zoo research and applied toward improving the environment
of captive gorillas, much ongoing research has focused on all-male
groups and findings are anticipated to apply toward the successful
management of bachelors. The research examines all-male gorilla groups
from a variety of perspectives, including behavior, physiology,
personality, and exhibit design. Responsible for a multi-year
inter-institutional study on captive male gorillas has been Zoo
Atlanta’s Tara Stoinski, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo’s Kristen Lukas, and
Disney’s Animal Kingdom’s Chris Kuhar. Currently, 14 zoos participate in
the study by collecting behavioral datat on their gorillas. Data are
collected from males of all-male groups as well as those in mixed-sex
groupings. These institutions plus a number of additional zoos assist in
the collection of physiological data for the study as well by collecting
urine samples from males. Louisville Zoo is currently participating with
both aspects of this research.
With the growing number of captive
gorilla births, it is likely that zoos will need to create and maintain
an additional ten to twenty (or even more) bachelor groups in the next
few years. The Gorilla SSP strongly encourages zoos to house bachelor
groups when possible.
In playing its part to help the captive
gorilla population, Louisville Zoo accepted the responsibility of trying
to successfully form and maintain a bachelor group of gorillas. In
deciding how to form this bachelor group, recent findings from research
were investigated and revealed that some of the most successful bachelor
groups thus far have been those created with young males during their
formative years. However, to more closely approach species-typical
norms, males deemed for allocation into long-term bachelor groups, such
as those that are genetically well represented, should still be able in
their early years to reap the benefits of social or family groups before
forming all-male groups of their own at approximately 8-10 years of age
(Stoinski et al., in press).
To accommodate the construction of its
new African ape facility, Lincoln Park Zoo in 2002 loaned to Louisville
Zoo twelve gorillas (four males and eight females) for the latter’s
newly constructed Gorilla Forest. Until Debbie’s death August 2003, the
social composition of the gorillas consisted of a social unit of five
(JoJo and his four adult females, now with infant Azizi), a social unit
of six (Frank, Debbie, and the four juveniles in the group), and a
solitary-but-content Helen. All of JoJo’s group and Rollie and Mumbali
are scheduled to return to Lincoln Park Zoo in May 2004, but remaining
behind will be Frank, Jelani, Bengati, and Helen.
Genetically well-represented males,
Jelani and Bengati are good candidates to go into a bachelor group.
Frank is very paternal toward these two males, and he has historically
surrogated other youngsters in his group as well. Because of the young
ages and social histories of mother-raised Jelani (born January 1997)
and Bengati (born June 1998) and the paternalism of Frank, the addition
of two young males to the group was deemed optimistically successful.
Previously, Debbie with juveniles Rollie and Mumbali occupied this group
as well. Males integrated into this group would have been exposed to the
“family” elements that the females provided. Unfortunately, Debbie’s
death was untimely, and she was unable to loan her excellent surrogacy
skills to likely help integrate the chosen males into the group.
However, many attributes of this group still constitute a family group,
albeit not a typical one. Rollie and Mumbali showed no signs of
separation anxiety from Debbie, and they continue to demonstrate many
prosocial behaviors in Frank’s current troop. The friendly behavior is
often reciprocated from the males. Additionally, Frank is paternal
toward and very tolerant of the females. Until their return to Chicago,
Louisville Zoo gorilla and management staff felt that Rollie and Mumbali
should remain in their current group to provide what social
contributions they can in that brief time. They, too, will benefit from
the males’ presence and even learn skills valuable to gorilla
introductions. Once they return to their new home, Rollie and Mumbali
are scheduled for integration into JoJo’s group.
Louisville Zoo collaborated with the
Gorilla SSP and Lincoln Park Zoo to research the availability of two
mother-raised gorillas of similar age to Jelani and Bengati that resided
in a North American Zoo. Ideally, these gorillas would be genetically
well represented as well. It took little time to find the perfect
candidates, Cincinnati Zoo’s Kicho (born March 1997) and Cecil (born
November 1998). Both mother raised and well socialized in the same
troop, they are almost the same ages as Jelani and Bengati, and are
genetically well represented as well. Making their potential transfer to
Louisville even more attractive was the fact that they had been
exhibiting reproductive behaviors toward members of their family group,
and Cincinnati hoped for their relocation to another zoo. Rapid and
cooperative communication between Cincinnati Zoo and Louisville Zoo (and
owning institution Philadelphia Zoo), as well as timely authorization
from the Gorilla SSP, resulted in the transfer of Cincy’s males only a
couple of months after the candidates were identified.
Adhering to zoo policy, Kicho and Cecil
spent approximately one month in quarantine. In working with them during
that time, their personalities hinted to staff that Louisville Zoo
indeed received the correct pair of males to introduce to Frank, Jelani,
and Bengati. In addition to five males expected to get along, the design
of the gorilla facility provides elements essential to forming a
bachelor group. High flexibility and spaciousness, as well as high
degree of accessibility of staff to gorillas, are definitely
advantageous to any gorilla introductory process. Gaining skills as
gorilla keepers for the past two years, Gorilla Forest animal staff has
on a daily basis demonstrated proficiency in rotating the gorillas
throughout their spaces, training them for flexibility (in shifting and
separating, something very advantageous during a gorilla introduction)
and prosocial behaviors, and granting them control and the ability to
make choices as much as possible. Other aspects of the area’s
comprehensive enrichment program that are employed each day, and that
scheduled for implementation, will likely help the process of forming a
bachelor group of gorillas well.
In playing its part to assist the
captive gorilla population, Louisville Zoo Gorilla Forest staff is
confident and determined to ensure success in conducting this
introduction to form and maintain a successful bachelor group of
gorillas.
References
Beck, B., and Power, M. 1988.
Correlates of sexual and maternal competence in captive gorillas. Zoo
Biology 7: 339-350.
Hutchins, M., Smith, B., Fulk, R.,
Perkins, L., Reinhartz, G., and Wharton, D. 2001. Rights or welfare: A
response to the Great Ape Project. In Great Apes & Humans: The Ethics
of Coexistence, eds. B. Beck, T. Stoinski, M. Hutchins, T. Maple, B.
Norton, A. Rowan, E. Stevens, and A. Arluke, 329-366.Washington,D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
Parnell, R. 2002. Group size and
structure in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla) at
Mbeli Bai, Republic of Congo. Am. J. Primatol. 56: 193-206.
Ryan, S., Thompson, S., Roth, A., and
Gold, K. 2002.
Effects of hand-rearing on the reproductive success of western lowland
gorillas in North America. Zoo Biology 21(4): 389-401.
Stoinski, T., Kuhar, C., Lukas, K., and
Maple, T. In press. Social dynamics of male western lowland gorillas
living in bachelor groups. Behaviour. |